Groundwater Flow Modeling and Adopting a Different Approach in Dealing Pumping Wells

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

1 Assistant Professor, Department of Economic Sciences and Water Engineering, University of Torbat Heydarieh, Torbat-e Heydarieh, Iran.

2 Asistant Professor, Department of Water Engineering, Lorestan University, Khorramabad, Iran.

3 Associate Professor, Department of Water Engineering, Gorgan University of Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources, Gorgan, Iran.

10.22077/jwhr.2025.10542.1195

Abstract

In groundwater flow modeling, as in any modeling problem, a certain amount of error is inevitable. Recharge or discharge wells, acting as point sources or sinks, play a key role in modeling accuracy, and the way they are treated can either reduce or increase errors. In this study, two approaches were investigated: first, transferring the well to the nearest node in its neighborhood, and second, distributing the pumping rate of the well among the closest nodes. A hypothetical aquifer was examined under two conditions-unconfined and confined-and using both triangular and square meshes. The results indicated that simplifying the model by moving the pumping well to the nearest node is justified only for unconfined aquifers with triangular meshes. For other cases-including unconfined aquifers with square meshes and confined aquifers with either mesh-the second approach is recommended, as it significantly reduces errors in groundwater flow modeling. These findings can also be generalized to real aquifer studies. Quantitative results show that Approach 2 consistently reduces modeling errors: for unconfined aquifers, MAE values are below 0.03 for both mesh types, whereas confined aquifers exhibit larger reductions, particularly with triangular meshes, where MAE reaches 0.38 and maximum errors up to 1.17. These results highlight the robustness of Approach 2 across different mesh configurations and aquifer conditions, providing an effective and reliable numerical tool for groundwater modeling.

Keywords

Main Subjects

References

Akbarpour, A., Zeynali, M. J., & Tahroudi, M. N. (2020). Locating optimal position of pumping Wells in aquifer using meta-heuristic algorithms and finite element method. Water Resources Management, 34(1), 21-34.
Eldho, T. I., & Swathi, B. (2018). Groundwater contamination problems and numerical simulation. Environmental Contaminants: Measurement, Modelling and Control, 167-194.
Ghafouri, H. R., & Darabi, B. S. (2007). Optimal identification of ground-water pollution sources. International Journal of Civil Engineering, 5(2), 144-156.
Guneshwor L, Eldho TI, Kumar AV (2018). Identification of Groundwater Contamination Sources Using Meshfree RPCM Simulation and Particle Swarm Optimization. Water Resources Management, 32(4): 1517-1538.
Istok, J. D. (1989). Groundwater modeling by the finite element method (Vol. 13, p. 132). Washington, DC: American Geophysical Union.
Jafarzadeh, A., Pourreza-Bilondi, M., Akbarpour, A., Khashei-Siuki, A., & Azizi, M. (2023). Sensitivity and stability analysis for groundwater numerical modeling: a field study of finite element application in the arid region. Acta Geophysica, 71(2), 1045-1062.
Koch, T., Helmig, R., & Schneider, M. (2020). A new and consistent well model for one-phase flow in anisotropic porous media using a distributed source model. Journal of Computational Physics, 410, 109369.
Kumar D, Ch S, Mathur S, Adamowski J (2015). Multi-objective optimization of in-situ bioremediation of groundwater using a hybrid metaheuristic technique based on differential evolution, genetic algorithms and simulated annealing. Journal of Water and Land Development, 27(1), 29-40.
Lozano Hernández, B. L., Marín Celestino, A. E., Martínez Cruz, D. A., Ramos Leal, J. A., Hernández Pérez, E., García Pazos, J., & Almanza Tovar, O. G. (2024). A systematic review of the current state of numerical groundwater modeling in American Countries: Challenges and future research. Hydrology, 11(11), 179.
Mategaonkar, M., Eldho, T. I., & Kamat, S. (2018). In-situ bioremediation of groundwater using a meshfree model and particle swarm optimization. Journal of Hydroinformatics, 20(4), 886-897.
Mohtashami A, Akbarpour A, Mollazadeh M (2017). Development of two-dimensional groundwater flow simulation model using meshless method based on MLS approximation function in unconfined aquifer in transient state. Journal of Hydroinformatics, 19(5), 640-652.
Reilly, T. E., & Harbaugh, A. W. (2004). Guidelines for evaluating ground-water flow models. DIANE Publishing.
Sharief, S. M. V., Eldho, T. I., Rastogi, A. K., & Gurunadha Rao, V. V. S. (2012). Optimal groundwater remediation by pump and treat using FEM-and EGA-based simulation-optimization model. Journal of Hazardous, Toxic, and Radioactive Waste, 16(2), 106-117.
Singh, K. G., & Pathania, T. (2025). Development and real field application of meshless generalized finite difference method for unconfined groundwater flow modelling. Mathematics and Computers in Simulation.
Vellando, P., Juncosa, R., Padilla, F., & García-Rábade, H. (2020). Numerical evaluation of groundwater flows: MODFLOW vs. FE models. Journal of Porous Media, 23(6).
Zeynali, M. J. , Nazeri Tahroudi, M. and Mohammadrezapour, O. (2024). Investigating the Optimization-Simulation Problem of Groundwater Remediation Under Various Scenarios. Water Harvesting Research, 7(1), 125-139.
Zeynali, M. J. , Nazeri Tahroudi, M. and Mohammadrezapour, O. (2024). Optimizing Pump-and-Treat Method by Using Optimization-Simulation Models. Sustainable Earth Trends, 4(3), 19-30. doi: 10.48308/set.2024.236332.1060
Zeynali, M. J., Pourreza-Bilondi, M., Akbarpour, A., Yazdi, J., & Zekri, S. (2022). Optimizing pump-and-treat method by considering important remediation objectives. Applied Water Science, 12(12), 268.
Zeynali, M. J., Pourreza-Bilondi, M., Akbarpour, A., Yazdi, J., & Zekri, S. (2022). Development of a contaminant concentration transport model for sulfate-contaminated areas. Applied Water Science, 12(7), 169.
Water Harvesting Research
Volume 8, Issue 2
2025
Pages 284-298

Files

Share

How to cite

Statistics